im zweifel für den zweifel

The raw malice that the Goldstone Report evinces toward Israel, the one party about which the panelists can say nothing good (as opposed to their exuberant, repeated praise for the “resilient” people of Gaza), demonstrates convincingly that the source of the imbalance lay in the UN committee’s mental structure. More information would have meant nothing. In the commissioners’ jaundiced view of the conflict, the Israeli leadership’s guilt for premeditated murder on a mass scale was taken as a philosophical given, a first premise not open to logical challenge.

hillel neuer vom ngo unwatch über gut gemeinte hinweise und ihre folgen im goldstone report.

1 Antwort auf “im zweifel für den zweifel”

  1. 1 cyberpunk 22. Januar 2010 um 19:23 Uhr
Die Kommentarfunktion wurde für diesen Beitrag deaktiviert.